Graduation Year

2013

Date of Thesis Acceptance

Spring 5-14-2013

Major Department or Program

Philosophy

Advisor(s)

Patrick Frierson

Abstract

A philosophy of math education makes claims, even if only implicitly, about the nature of mathematical knowledge. As a result, philosophies of education corresponding to conflicting philosophies of mathematics must be quite different. My Thesis demonstrates this claim using the philosophies of Imre Lakatos and Alfred North Whitehead. I also show that the philosophies of education and corresponding philosophies of mathematics of both men are related in sophisticated ways, not just the naïve ways one might think at first. Finally, I give a brief account of an ‘American’ philosophy of education based on classroom practice, and I critique it using the two contrasting philosophies of education of Lakatos and Whitehead.

Page Count

83

Subject Headings

Philosophy and education, Imre Lakatos (1922-1974), Alfred North Whitehead (1861-1947), Mathematics -- Philosophy, Student assessment -- Understanding through education, Whitman College 2013 -- Dissertation collection -- Philosophy Department

Permanent URL

http://hdl.handle.net/10349/1222

Document Type

Whitman Community Accessible Thesis

Terms of Use

If you have questions about permitted uses of this content, please contact the ARMINDA administrator

Share

COinS
 

Rights Statement

Rights Statement

In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).