Date of Thesis Acceptance
Major Department or Program
The present study tested the effects of boredom, flow, and anxiety on a moral judgment task. Two competing theories predicted different relationships between emotional state and moral reasoning. The first hypothesis predicted that participants in the anxiety and flow conditions would choose significantly fewer utilitarian responses on moral-personal questions than those in the boredom condition. The second hypothesis predicted that participants in the anxiety and boredom conditions would choose significantly fewer utilitarian responses on moral-personal questions than those in the flow condition. Thirty-six Whitman College students were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions, played two 6-minute rounds of Tetris, and completed a survey which included manipulation checks and a moral judgment task. The results did not conclusively support either hypothesis. However, a significant effect of mood group on moral-personal questions was found, whereby participants in a positive mood state chose fewer utilitarian responses. Implications of the effect of emotional states on moral judgments are discussed.
Emotions -- Moral and ethical aspects, Emotions -- psychological aspects, Boredom, Anxiety -- Testing, Positive psychology -- Research -- Methodology, Social sciences, Whitman College -- Dissertation collection 2015 -- Psychology Department
Public Accessible Thesis
If you have questions about permitted uses of this content, please contact the ARMINDA administrator
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).