Date of Thesis Acceptance
Major Department or Program
This project examines the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, an Obama-era immigration policy that provided temporary work permits for a particular set of young, undocumented migrants. I am interested in the ways that DACA became a site where “the nation” was debated, articulated, formed, and contested. Public discourses about DACA are not just about immigration policy: they are doing important political work in the reproduction of the national imaginary. To uncover the nature of that work, I pose the following question: How did discourses in the national print media surrounding the rollout of DACA interact with, (re)produce, and/or contest the boundaries of the American “nation”? Paying particular attention to the ways in which narratives about migrant assimilation interacted with race, precarity, and legal status, I analyze a set of articles published in the New York Times in order to interrogate how a “common sense” understanding of the nation was reproduced.
New York times‚ Emigration and immigration -- Government policy -- Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) -- United States‚ Illegal aliens‚ Immigrants‚ Noncitizens‚ Unauthorized immigration‚ Discourse analysis -- Political aspects‚ Press -- Influence‚ Communities‚ Common sense‚ Social sciences‚ Whitman College 2018 -- Dissertation collection -- Politics Department
Public Accessible Thesis
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).